Author Topic: windows performance index  (Read 5425 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Super

  • GraveDiggaZ
  • *
  • Posts: 437
windows performance index
« on: September 26, 2011, 12:20:47 am »
hehe Robba,

Like you thought the memory issue was bugging the hell outa me, but as you can see I got it fixed   ;)
 
[hs width=300 height=300]http://gravediggaz.org/imghost/image.php?id=552C_4E7FB602&jpg[/hs]
yes, it is a long headshot.

Offline deviloid

  • Posts: 359
  • just stfu
    • home of silko
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2011, 01:41:21 am »
u still run you'r ocz in raid? i thought you get more with it cuze mine is 7.8... wired

Offline Super

  • GraveDiggaZ
  • *
  • Posts: 437
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #2 on: September 26, 2011, 03:14:47 am »
yeah m8, it's still raid 0.
I guess it's "only" 7.7 coz the sequential "read" and "write's" of my ocz disk's aren't as fast as your intel's

I'm happy tho coz upping the qpi dram voltage a tad got my rig running stable at 4 GHz now for over 4 hours with only 10 watt's more on the outlet.
Temps are still well clear of "too hot" but I can't get more out of it without blue screening on load test (prime 95) 
« Last Edit: September 26, 2011, 03:30:15 am by Super »
yes, it is a long headshot.

Offline Robba

  • BadRobot
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Nihilistic Misanthrope
    • gravediggaz.org
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2011, 02:28:02 pm »
Wondered how long it would take ;)
Some shit here

Offline Super

  • GraveDiggaZ
  • *
  • Posts: 437
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #4 on: September 26, 2011, 03:25:03 pm »
Wondered how long it would take ;)

about two years  :D
yes, it is a long headshot.

Offline Robba

  • BadRobot
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Nihilistic Misanthrope
    • gravediggaz.org
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #5 on: September 26, 2011, 04:56:46 pm »
Bloody mecha hard drive is slaying ma score man! 5.9 with a throughput of 280Mb/s. Robbed, Robbed i tell thee! why do they limit it to 5.9 when the raid set is clearly faster than a single which will also rate at 5.9. Just cuz its not SSD. the bastards.
Some shit here

Offline groundpounder1

  • Professional lurker. Amateur everything else
  • Junior Admin
  • *
  • Posts: 840
  • I aint give, no fuck.
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #6 on: September 26, 2011, 05:02:00 pm »
lol your processor is better rated than mine yet mine should be better ;D

also it is a git how you are limited to 5.9. mine is 5.9 and i only have 1 mech HDD unraided :S

Offline Super

  • GraveDiggaZ
  • *
  • Posts: 437
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #7 on: September 26, 2011, 05:14:44 pm »
Bloody mecha hard drive is slaying ma score man! 5.9 with a throughput of 280Mb/s. Robbed, Robbed i tell thee! why do they limit it to 5.9 when the raid set is clearly faster than a single which will also rate at 5.9. Just cuz its not SSD. the bastards.

nice score's m8 !
triple core's running at what?........ speed of light?
yes, it is a long headshot.

Offline Robba

  • BadRobot
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 2,209
  • Nihilistic Misanthrope
    • gravediggaz.org
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #8 on: September 26, 2011, 05:18:23 pm »
Get yours up then GP ;)



Some shit here

Offline groundpounder1

  • Professional lurker. Amateur everything else
  • Junior Admin
  • *
  • Posts: 840
  • I aint give, no fuck.
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #9 on: September 26, 2011, 05:19:24 pm »
ahhh you're overclocking you little swine.

I dont do that, suits me fine at standard. whats .1 between friends :D


EDIT- Actually I take it back, I have the exact same processor as you not the 965 like i thought. I think I decided against the 965 cuz it wasnt worth the money difference and spent it elsewhere instead heh
« Last Edit: September 26, 2011, 05:21:17 pm by groundpounder1 »

Offline groundpounder1

  • Professional lurker. Amateur everything else
  • Junior Admin
  • *
  • Posts: 840
  • I aint give, no fuck.
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2011, 05:25:36 pm »
[hs width=300 height=200]http://i834.photobucket.com/albums/zz268/ada5tra/Untitled-4.png[/hs]

Offline slick

  • Posts: 197
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2011, 08:22:53 pm »
.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2012, 10:20:51 pm by slick050 »

Offline Super

  • GraveDiggaZ
  • *
  • Posts: 437
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #12 on: September 29, 2011, 06:42:01 pm »
what drives are ya using slick?
yes, it is a long headshot.

Offline slick

  • Posts: 197
Re: windows performance index
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2011, 02:49:16 am »
.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2012, 10:21:03 pm by slick050 »

 

User

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?


Login with username, password and session length

* Navigation



* Statistics

  • *Total Members: 255
  • *Latest: Dearman

  • *Total Posts: 19467
  • *Total Topics: 9645
  • *Online Today: 42
  • *Most Online: 112
(December 08, 2012, 10:48:53 am)
  • *Users: 0
  • *Guests: 31
  • *Spiders: 0
  • *Total: 31